Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89.  from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Validation of age estimation and back-calculation of fish length

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FISH LENGTH AND OTOLITH DIMENSIONS IN THE CA

Individual back-calculated size-at-age based on otoliths from

Forklift Fork Dimensions and Types

Experimental validation of otolith-based age and growth

Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size

Monthly percentage of opaque edges observed in modern samples of

PDF) Variability in fish size/otolith radius relationships among

Linking variation in planktonic primary production to coral reef

Christian MÖLLMANN, Professor, Prof. Dr., University of Hamburg, Hamburg, UHH, Institute for Marine Ecosystem and Fisheries Science

PDF) Using Otolith Shape Analysis to Identify Different Stocks of

Christian MÖLLMANN, Professor, Prof. Dr., University of Hamburg, Hamburg, UHH, Institute for Marine Ecosystem and Fisheries Science

Relationship Between Otolith Measurements with the Size of